@JoxterTM: Of course it’s not a real char – it’s one of my developer machine testing characters! But I CAN assure you: That guy has fought tons of fort battles and his experience is LEGEND! He fought fort battles in July 2009 and even before that – but records of earlier fights do not even exist because there was no cemetery implemented yet! So please: A bit more respect for my underling test chars!
Very cool info guys! I am glad to see my money at work. Love your site…totally addicted and loving all the upgrades. Sorry for the frustration at times. But wanted to let you know that your doing a great job.
Good FeatherDecember 3, 2010
So a year from now we will be back in the same boat, people will be asking for level 150 – 200 – 300 where does it stop? why the need for a limit?
Granted WestWars, isnt the same, but it doesnt have a known level limit yet.
JoxerTMDecember 4, 2010
zet, respect, but is it possible to add a ranking of fortfighing players out of the fort cemetaries just like duelers have from the mortuary?
@JoxerTM: We have no certain planned features for 1.31, but reworking the ranking tables and including fort fights and extending statistics for each most important category (xp, duels, fort fights) each for alliances, towns and individuals is in my opinion an overdue improvement to the gameplay. We do collect already statistics on fort battle statistics for each player, but we do not yet use it. So when we’ll introduce such a feature, you don’t have to worry about your current and past progress (these stats do not date back to the start of the battles, but it’s in the game for quite some time now).
anorthosi4everDecember 4, 2010
zet,that means that exp will never end?It wouldnt be 0/0?
That means that you can continue collecting XP even if you have reached the maximum level. It doesn’t affect the position in the hall of fame, but it does affect the ranking in the XP table.
What will happen then if the level cap is removed again later?Players will continue with the experience they gained till that point? It is a bit unfair for all the players who are now stuck at level 99 for over a year and they start the race for 120 at the same position as the players who just reached 99.
@Athos: Contrary to the public opinion, we have no plans for raising the level limit again. You can gain XP when reaching the level cap and thus still fighting for the #1 rank position.
@arnasba: No, left side is what you have, right side is what you need to make progress – the laying 8 is the math symbol for “infinite”. So it could take quite a while to get beyond 120…
TheeagleJanuary 19, 2011
admins, what do you think about secure trade thing? for example, i have an item for sale ( eg wyatt earp’s buntline, again, it is just a suggestion ) and i found someone to trade it for jesse james schofield. now, of course, we wont be paying 100000$+ each, i was thinking of sending a secure trade for 6000 each, because if we put them on market it is a slight chance that the weapon wont go to the recipient, and we will loose big time.
i think , this is better π
http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/7716/screenshot8u.jpg
hehe i just need some more exp for reach game over π
Fine! 150-> This may be better. π
zet, that’s char from beta, right? It’s obvious it’s not real because on normal wolds such soldiers will have 12.000HP and pwn forts. :p
@JoxterTM: Of course it’s not a real char – it’s one of my developer machine testing characters! But I CAN assure you: That guy has fought tons of fort battles and his experience is LEGEND! He fought fort battles in July 2009 and even before that – but records of earlier fights do not even exist because there was no cemetery implemented yet! So please: A bit more respect for my underling test chars!
Very cool info guys! I am glad to see my money at work. Love your site…totally addicted and loving all the upgrades. Sorry for the frustration at times. But wanted to let you know that your doing a great job.
So a year from now we will be back in the same boat, people will be asking for level 150 – 200 – 300 where does it stop? why the need for a limit?
Granted WestWars, isnt the same, but it doesnt have a known level limit yet.
zet, respect, but is it possible to add a ranking of fortfighing players out of the fort cemetaries just like duelers have from the mortuary?
@JoxerTM: We have no certain planned features for 1.31, but reworking the ranking tables and including fort fights and extending statistics for each most important category (xp, duels, fort fights) each for alliances, towns and individuals is in my opinion an overdue improvement to the gameplay. We do collect already statistics on fort battle statistics for each player, but we do not yet use it. So when we’ll introduce such a feature, you don’t have to worry about your current and past progress (these stats do not date back to the start of the battles, but it’s in the game for quite some time now).
zet,that means that exp will never end?It wouldnt be 0/0?
That means that you can continue collecting XP even if you have reached the maximum level. It doesn’t affect the position in the hall of fame, but it does affect the ranking in the XP table.
@zet
Zet, I love you! Thanks!
What will happen then if the level cap is removed again later?Players will continue with the experience they gained till that point? It is a bit unfair for all the players who are now stuck at level 99 for over a year and they start the race for 120 at the same position as the players who just reached 99.
@Athos: Contrary to the public opinion, we have no plans for raising the level limit again. You can gain XP when reaching the level cap and thus still fighting for the #1 rank position.
lvl 120 pnly needs 5652 exp? π
@arnasba: No, left side is what you have, right side is what you need to make progress – the laying 8 is the math symbol for “infinite”. So it could take quite a while to get beyond 120…
admins, what do you think about secure trade thing? for example, i have an item for sale ( eg wyatt earp’s buntline, again, it is just a suggestion ) and i found someone to trade it for jesse james schofield. now, of course, we wont be paying 100000$+ each, i was thinking of sending a secure trade for 6000 each, because if we put them on market it is a slight chance that the weapon wont go to the recipient, and we will loose big time.